Lunar eclipse, dead birds, terrible weather, end of the world!

09 January 2011

This weekend dead birds have been falling from the sky and dead fish washing up on beaches. Today's Telegraph has the headline "Aflockalypse now!" The tongue in cheek article asks: were the sinister wildlife deaths reported around the globe foretold in the Bible, or just coincidence? Several outbreaks occurred deep inside the Southern US Bible Belt prompting shocked locals to search for religious meaning. But it doesn't stop with the bible belt, end of the world type theories are selling even in sunny Californian. The New Age crowd claim Dec 2012 is the end of a 5,125 year cycle in Mayan astrology.

A few weeks ago we experienced a full moon, winter solstice, and total lunar eclipse on 21 December 2010. This rare combination last occurred on 21 Dec 1638 (Gregorian Calendar). Looking back, 1638 was in fact in a very exciting point in history. In 1638 Protestant victories in Northern Germany marked a turning point in the 'Thirty Years' War' between Catholicism and Reformation. In 1638 Oliver Cromwell sent the famous letter, still surviving, which describes his spiritual awakening. In this letter he said he was sure the Reformation had not gone far enough, that England was still living in sin, and that Catholic beliefs and practices needed to be purged. So 1638 was a vital moment in the transition between St Francis of Asisi's feminine vision of Christianity, and Martin Luther's more masculine vision. In France, 1638 was the year Louis XIV 'The Sun King' was born, but more importantly, it was also the year René Descartes began writing his Meditations, the book widely regarded as kick-starting the Age Of Enlightenment. In China 1638 was year the first Qing Emperor was born, and a few years later the rather effeminate Ming dynasty ended. In the Middle East Murat IV all but wiped out Shia Islam. Murat the IV was quite a character, an enormously powerful man who wielded a 60kg mace with his right arm. I doubt his enemy the Shah Safi could have even lifted the mace. The sultan was famous for having no intellectual or cultural interests, instead he spent his time drinking wine, smoking opium, and indulging himself in various other pleasures. The citizens of Baghdad were under siege at the time of the eclipse and surrendered to Murat three days later. North America was still a backwater in the early 1600s, nevertheless, 1638 was the year John Harvard died leaving the charitable legacy which created Harvard University.

Adding to the sense of foreboding, 2010 has also seen some extraordinary weather. Several countries set record high temperatures in the summer of 2010, then the winter of 2010 turned out to be exceptionally cold and wet. Weather records for 1638 are pretty sketchy, but October 1638 is famous for the 'Great Thunderstorm' of Widecombe-in-the-Moor England. A ball of fire fell from the sky and burnt down a church in the middle of evening services, killing and injuring several members of the congregation. One study I found claims that according to data on births and deaths recorded by Church parishes in Sussex England during the early 1600s, 1638 and 1639 showed the highest mortality rates. An old Theosophical pamphlet called the "Theory Of Cycles" looked for patterns in extreme weather conditions and said "in 1639 the harbour of Marseilles was covered with ice to a great distance". On campaign in Northern Germany the Protestant Field Marshal Johan Banér also recorded an uncommonly cold winter in 1638.

So the interesting question is: will historians look back on 2010 with as much excitement as 1638? Personally I think it will indeed be remembered as a watershed year.

January 2010 saw an outpouring of articles on the rise of China. For example, writing in the Financial Times, Niall Ferguson said:

I am trying to remember now where it was, and when it was, that it hit me. Was it during my first walk along the Bund in Shanghai in 2005? Was it amid the smog and dust of Chonqing, listening to a local Communist party official describe a vast mound of rubble as the future financial centre of south-west China? That was last year, and somehow it impressed me more than all the synchronised razzamatazz of the Olympic opening ceremony in Beijing. Or was it at Carnegie Hall only last month, as I sat mesmerised by the music of Angel Lam, the dazzlingly gifted young Chinese composer who personifies the Orientalisation of classical music? I think maybe it was only then that I really got the point about this decade, just as it was drawing to a close: that we are living through the end of 500 years of western ascendancy.

For fans of statistics some 2010 China benchmarks include: becoming the world's largest energy user, becoming the world's second largest economy, topping the OECD survey of world education standards (Shanghai), becoming the world leader in a high tech industry (high speed rail).

The credit crisis began in 2008, but it has taken until 2010 for the implications to really sink in. In August 2010 Joseph Stiglitz summed up the lessons of the credit crisis with an article called "Needed: a new economic paradigm":

The blame game continues over who is responsible for the worst recession since the Great Depression – the financiers who did such a bad job of managing risk or the regulators who failed to stop them. But the economics profession bears more than a little culpability... Bad models lead to bad policy... Economic theory had already shown that many of the central conclusions of the standard model were not robust. We knew that even small information asymmetries, or imperfections in risk markets, meant that markets were not efficient. Celebrated results, such as Adam Smith’s invisible hand, did not hold; the invisible hand was invisible because it was not there... [yet] like the Ptolemaic attempts to preserve earth-centric views of the universe, [we economists turned a blind eye to these failings. Now our eyes have been forced open, and it is time for a whole new economic paradigm].

In December 2010 Wolfgang Schäuble finally figured out what economics in the 21st Century means for democracy. In an  article in the Wall Street Journal he said:

Sometimes it takes crises so that Europe moves forward. In this crisis, Europe will find steps toward further unification. It isn't easy. You can't just command European states and their populations... Public opinion will need time. This is true in all democracies... In Europe the nation state as the sole level of policy-making has exhausted its effectiveness... I am not the last pro-European in Germany, perhaps I'm the first European of the 21st century.

Of course Schäuble is mostly only talking about overriding democracy and forcing responsible policy onto the feckless Greeks, Portuguese, Spanish, Italians etc. But the end of democracy is not just a European thing. 2010 is the year we realized Obama is another idiot and America is doomed. 2010 is the year we gave up on democracy in Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan. In democratic India the 2010 news has been relentlessly negative - from the commonwealth games to exploding satellites. In a February 2010 article in the Times, the well known journalist Anatole Kaletsky said:

THE most important statements are often those that are left unsaid. At Davos, the question that nobody quite dared to utter was clear: will the new model of economics that emerges to dominate the world will be a radically reformed version of the Western democratic system or some variant of the authoritarian state-led capitalism favoured in China?

But the 2011 Davos will be different. These sentiments are no longer left unsaid, they are shouted from Eastern roof tops. So 2010 is the year the Western elite began to get it: liberal democracy doesn't work, the future is paternal authoritarianism, Christian morality is dead, the world is moving toward hard headed rationality.

It's not just the year the elite awoke. Although the masses don't understand what has occurred in the world of economics and democracy, 2010 is the year their populist rejection of the moral liberal consensus attained critical mass. Under pressure from changing public opinion, politicians across Europe crossed the Rubicon in 2010. Angela Merkel declared multiculturalism a failure, Nicolas Sarkozy began expelling Romanian Immigrants, Hungary began to move away from a free press, and Sarah Palin's Tea Party went viral. So it's not just the elite that changed in 2010, it's really the beginning of the mass rejection of Western values. This, as fans of my web site know, is the beginning of the sociological nervous breakdown I have been claiming is close.

What about the lunar eclipse? Could Carl Jung's theory of synchronicity be possible? Could the moon reflect psychological energy, and the eclipse an important moment in history? Several studies have shown that crime statistics, car accidents and medical emergencies are statistically higher during a full moon. For example, according to an article in Time Magazine called "Medicine: Blood & the Moon", an American doctor investigating tonsillectomy surgery bleeding crises supposedly noticed a statistical correlation between crisis frequency and full moons.

As a trader I have personally noticed a correlation between full moons and market movements. It it not easy to describe this correlation, but I can give some famous examples. Lehman's Brothers, for example, went bankrupt on September 15th 2008, which was a full moon. Perhaps it had been on its last legs for a while, but the full moon drove Hank Paulson looney and he decided to blow up the world. On the full moon of January 21st 2008 Société Générale liquidated Jérôme Kerviel's rouge trading position causing panic. After the Sep 11th Attacks the stock market was closed until Sep 17th 2001, another full moon. Whilst I haven't seen any studies that prove a correlation between the moon and the financial markets, I know several traders open to the idea. The full moon supposedly represents a time of excitement. If you think you the market is overbought the full moon might be a good time to sell, if you are waiting for a breakout the full moon might help.

What would Confucius have said? The moon is traditionally associated with the feminine, and the sun the masculine. The moon and the sun appear to be the same size in the sky because, by one of those strange coincidences, although the sun is 400 times bigger than the moon, it is also 400 times further away. In the same way the moon and sun are said to be equally powerful in human personality. The moon is often imagined as emotional and individualist, the sun as pragmatic and socially useful.

A solar eclipse occurs when the moon blocks the sun, imagine someone full of extroverted functional energy taking a moment to reflect internally on what is going on. A famous solar eclipse during the 585BC 'Battle of Halys' ended the war between the Lydians and the Medes. The armies stopped fighting during the eclipse, and later agreed to a peace treaty. Perhaps we can imagine the Solar Eclipse over Europe in August 1999 as a chance to reflect amidst the madness of the dot com bubble.

A lunar eclipse, on the other hand, occurs when the moon looses the illumination of the sun. Imagine a drunk loosing his family, this nervous breakdown provokes a psychological turning point. Lunar eclipses are more feared, and there are several famous lunar eclipses in history which supposedly portended great social change. For example, we have the famous lunar eclipse that occurred just before democratic Athens lost the Peloponnesian War with Sparta in 413BC. Another famous lunar eclipse occurred during the siege of Constantinople which ended the Roman Empire. Another lunar eclipse occurred on 16 September 1978, three and a half hours later a violent earthquake shook Iran killing 25,000 people, six months later the Shah of Iran was overthrown by the Iranian Revolution. During the early 1970s Middle Eastern countries outraged by US support for Israel refused to sell America oil, provoking the oil crisis and wreaking havoc on the world economy. In order to safeguard its oil supply America then started plying Arab politicians with cash, driving a wedge between the people and the leadership, turning the Middle East into a tyranny. Of course this can not last forever, today populist protest manifests as terrorism and increasingly tension. Iran was the first Arab county to cast off the American puppet leadership - but it will not be the last! I am not advocating Hezbollah, but psychological evolution is not a monotonic progression to good.

What is the psychological transition taking place today? The move away from Semitc values, from individualism to collectivism, from egalitarianism to elitism, from liberty to paternalism, from emotion to rationality. It's another shot at the The Age of Enlightenment, I call it the The Age of Enlightenment Part II.

From Washington to Mexico City to Athens to Mogadishu to Tunis to Islamabad the problem is the same – corrupted values and governmental incompetence. The Eurozone struggles are but a microcosm of this problem. In the run up to 1638 the challenge was population growth, today the growth of emerging market countries yet again hurls civilisation up against resource challenges. Saint Francis of Assisi's vision of Christianity was deeply submissive, dependent on others, uninterested in theological theory, transcending self by suffering and rejection of pleasure, exuding love in uncomplicated benevolence. As the world evolved, as population density increased, the black death and starvation killed vast numbers, and Puritans sensed the practical failings of Saint Francis of Assisi's Christianity and built something more suitable to the prevailing challenges of life. We are back in the same place today.

Incompetent government is unsustainable, in the long run it is death. Today pretty much every country in the world except Singapore and China is run so badly it can not last. Now one of the interesting things is what this economic breakdown means for geopolitics because the temptation for the dying democracy of America to invade the Middle East and grab their oil will be enormous. Do you seriously think a bankrupt failing America run by the Tea Party could resist? The American Revolution is up there in lights with the French Revolution. You think people are better today? The truth is people are worse, everything they believe is total junk, and when it all comes away they will go absolutely insane. Germany already went through this process in the 1930s, and it is the least sick nation in the Western World, but America is absolutely finished. The Middle East has a huge journey ahead of it, the move from Semitic morality to rationality, but they are not individualists, postmodernists and democrats. Look at Attuturk, he exemplified Enlightenment rationality, although the psychological turmoil killed him. Like the Middle East America hasn't even started to reject Christianity, but America adds much more serious issues on top. Hitler is nothing compared to what the American have in store for themselves.

There was a mad Chinese rebel leader called Zhang Xianzhong around 1638 who used to write pomes to death. "Kill Kill Kill Kill Kill Kill" he said. Over population became an issue in China as well as in Europe, for example the 1628 Great Famine of Shaanxi. So Zhang Xianzhong killed to reduce the population in the name God. The population of Sichuan fell from 3,000,000 to 18,000. When his soldiers had finished killing everyone they could find he divided them in two and set them upon themselves. Perhaps, one day America will go this mad. Or maybe Zhang Xianzhong wasn't mad at all? Perhaps it was the best possible response to population pressure at the time.

Einstein once said nuclear weapons make a world government unavoidable. Of course they called him a crackpot, yet I think he was just ahead of his time. The uneven distribution of resources necessitates a world government, especially given the huge resource challenges we face. In the distant future all the land in the world will be owned by a single global government, and it will distribute the rental income across the global population. No one could resist this global government, even with nuclear weapons to defend themselves they need to trade. So this outcome is inevitable, it is just a question of time, and the founders of the Eurozone were dimly aware of this. On the way massive conflict is probably unavoidable, and China should bring its armed forces up to speed, because it might need them.

What about the Winter Solstice? Perhaps the move from Autumn to Winter parallels the move from 20th Century profligacy to 21st Century austerity. It is certainly going to be a terribly painful transition loved only by those who love the clear headed beauty of winter. Keep in mind Stalin's advice: "a single death is a tragedy, a million is a statistic".  

They say 'as within, so without', 'as above so below' - and strange as it is the full moon, winter solstice, and total lunar eclipse do mesh rather well with the profound psychological moves ahead. We are back where we were in 1638, population growth and primitive religion. We blew it back then, this time we will make it. 

This is going to be my last article for a while I am afraid. I wish I had gotten a chance to write about the advantages of state owned real estate, also more on the what Europe should be doing to compete. Alas I am afraid I am very tied up for the next few months.