Eurozone Crisis - Italian Government Bonds Yields Hit 7.5%
09 Nov 2011
Ten year Italian government bond yields today rose to 7.5%. This is an
absolutely disastrous yield which cannot be sustained for any period of
time. Now is the for action, and this article carefully explains where
we have come from, where we are now, and where we need to go next.
Many journalists have been publishing articles calling on the ECB to
intervene by buying Italian Bonds - yet this is completely the wrong
advice. As one expert in financial markets pointed out repeatedly on
Bloomberg News today - "ITALY IS TOO BIG TO BAIL OUT". Over and
over again the people he was talking to kept talking about different
rescue plans, but over and over again he had to stop them in their
tracks with these deadly words. The ECB have already racked up enormous losses buying
government bonds,
Italy cannot be saved in this way.
Many journalists talk about money printing. If Italy can't pay it's debt
they say the ECB should bail them out with printed money. People call money
printing the "magic bullet" that can save Europe, but what they forget
is that magic tricks are sleigh of hand, if you follow the money
carefully you will see it is just moving from Northern Europeans to
Southern Europeans. In the last few years dozens of these schemes have
been suggested in the press, but they are like the systems
muddle headed gamblers dream up to beat the roulette wheel, or the
free energy perpetual motion machines hobbyists build in their garages,
or the perfectly hedged structured credit derivative swaps that
financial salesmen used to claim make positive carry without any risk -
they are all fantasies. In the UK and USA today money printing is being
used to stimulate the economy at the cost of savers; but when the
Eurozone was created the Germans got a guarantee that this soft option
would never be used. There is nothing wrong with that at all, the
history of economics is filled up with politically cowardly money
printing, the whole USA-UK-French campaign against the German
constitution is completely and utterly immoral. This crisis is not a
humanitarian apocalypse that makes the German constitution absurd, Italy
has two trillion euros in debts but it also has about two trillion euros
in state assets and over eight trillion euros in private banks accounts
and untold private real estate wealth. What we are
talking about is some of the richest countries in the world making some reforms,
the problem comes out of rich Western democracies being incompetent and
cowardly, and the whole purpose of the German constitution is to force
cowards and fools to behave responsibly. This crisis highlights, not
undermines, the importance of a no money printing constitution. The Germans aren't known for their
communications skills, but I think Angel Merkel's inability to argue her
case is a tragedy. The way the poor Germans are portrayed in the
European press is absolutely disgraceful, and journalist across Europe
desperately need to realise that their campaign against the Germans is
an injustice that could unleash a nationalism that will destroy Europe.
Those Greek newspapers full of swastikas are out there forever now, and
they are extremely dangerous.
Lots of journalists are writing articles saying the Germans need to gift
the Italians a one off windfall followed by pocket money for the rest of
their lives in fiscal union - but there is a difference between treating
the symptoms of a disease and treating the disease itself. If you
dropped a trillion Euros out of helicopters on Mogadishu, it wouldn't
turn Somalia into a nice healthy country, it would ultimately make the
situation much more dangerous. When you treat the symptoms of a disease
instead of the disease itself, it breaks out in a new more virulent
form. In antiquity the disease called "gout" was known as the affliction
of Kings. To cure it the Kings had to go on a diet, if a modern doctor
had popped back in a time machine and freed the Kings from gout, they
might have started getting more deadly heart disease instead. Disease
symptoms are messages and clues of an underlying problem, and making the
lifestyle modifications that clear up the surface symptoms synchronistically addresses the core inner issue. In the case of Kings
the real inner problem was something like "greed", and the tough self
disciplined lifestyle change of eating less to prevent the pains of gout
made them into better people inside. Now many journalists and politicians have been opposed to austerity from the very start
of this crisis, but it is time to face up to the fact that this advice has proven utterly disastrous
- it means that now we are just facing a much more painful condition. It
reminds me of the King who complained to his doctor "Why have you taken
Foie Gras out of my diet? It is a hardship that hasn't cured my gout, it
has just made my life worse, this diet of yours is self defeating." The
doctor replied "I am just getting started, it won't stop being self
defeating until the disease stops. It's not linear -austerity can
work if its tough enough"
What I saying in all these disease analogies is that for three years the
European elite has wasted time tinkering around with bailouts and bond
purchases, but THE ONLY THING THAT CAN KEEP ITALY IN THE EUROZONE IS
SHOCK AND AWE ECONOMIC REFORMS. All these rescue packages have bought is
a little bit of extra time at a very high cost. Now it's game over, now
it's time to cure this disease. Fear of pain prevented action, but these
wasted years have simply made what is to follow even more painful.
Forget about German bailouts and money printing, show the markets you
are serious about reform and the crisis is over, fail and the crisis is
never ending. The Western world of journalism and politics is not
honest, long term and philosophical; it is dishonest, short term and
ideological. People think it's smart to trick people with infantile
partisan arguments, but they are completely wrong, it's actually a dark
temptation that ends up poisoning one's own soul and one's own analysis.
The great danger of democracy and capitalism is that the dark side
outsells the good side in the short term, and this terrible, almost
unmentionable, fact has poisoned both the elite and the poor people they
are supposed to be caring for.
In the same way many journalists have portrayed the whole austerity debate to the public
in a completely misleading and populist way that portrays the Germans as
evil disciplinarians destroying the lives of protesting Greeks.
It is perfectly obvious even to a
child that the problem in Greece is that the Germans, ever conscious of
their WW2 record, and headed by a wet and unintelligent chancellor, have done far too little instead of too much. So instead
of implementing sensible policies that can create a more competitive
economy, the Greek government is dragging its feet and grudgingly
choosing tax increases and spending cuts based on mindless corrupt political
considerations that pander to various vested interests on the right and
left. You can't fix countries like Italy and
Greece just by tinkering around with pensions and taxes, you need to
implement profound structural reforms. Look at something Kaletsky wrote
today, it really sums up how depressing this whole situation is for the
smarter commentators:
Politicians in Europe, America or Britain simply see the crisis
entirely as a threat to established ways of life and modes of thinking.
Nobody is presenting a vision, or even a credible story, about how the
crisis could produce a better tomorrow... Despite the “Occupy” movement
and the swirl of rhetoric surrounding the protests, Western politicians
are focused entirely on rebuilding the old failed system. Germany pins
its hope on fiscal discipline. France may have brought forward the
raising of its retirement age from 60 to 62 but its politicians won’t
consider further reforms. The US Republicans denounce as “class warfare”
any suggestion that taxes on millionaires might rise from pre-crisis
levels, while Democrats resist any reform of social welfare rules
devised 50 years ago... [By contrast] In Asia political and business
leaders see the crisis as an opportunity to build a new form of
capitalism. They assume that the future can be, and should be, better
than the past...
The problem with so many supposedly learned academic economic
journalists is that they can't let go of their dogma, they can't embrace
new economic paradigms. Traders, businessmen and the “the ripped-off,
lied-to little people” are better at responding
to paradigm changes because they start loosing money, but Kool-Aid
drinking politicians and journalists are last people
in society to "wake up". This is especially true of the elite
journalists who are in charge of this debate. They are completely blind to the
big picture economic and political
philosophy, completely focused on discredited old fashioned broad macro economic
models. They are so out of touch with reality I call them witch doctors
trying to treat heart disease by putting ointment on the patients skin.
They have campaigned endlessly for stimulus and bailouts
but ignored the critical underlying issue of profound economic reforms. The politicians
got caught up in this chaos, and they have wasted the last few years debating
the speed of austerity, meanwhile they have done nothing improve
efficiency, and now the widow has closed anyway. Because the banks were
discredited they lost their voice and these supposedly learned
journalists with no practical experience in financial markets campaigned
for orderly default. Yet this campaign has disastrously destroyed the
market for European sovereign bonds, and until banks and pension funds
fall back in love with European sovereign bonds it's just a one way
trade to hell.
In order to really understand the enormity of the European elite's
failure, think about Tony Blair. He really exemplifies the humanitarian
laissez-faire socioeconomic system which is so responsible for Europe's
failure. The European elite think this populist sweet centre ground is
the perfect blend of yin and yang that most exemplifies the loving
essence of all good Christians. Yet the terrible, almost unmentionable,
truth is that they have blended the dark side of yin socialism and yang
capitalism and created what I call "the passive face of evil".
Christians think of evil as a single concept, but Eastern philosophers
know all concepts are bifurcated. To understand this passive face of
evil idea consider something Plato said: justice is courage, strength,
self control, and judgement. Humanitarian laissez-faire is the political
philosophy which revolves around REMOVING all four of these goods!
To understand this consider the idea of courage & strength. Whereas the
Americans have been trying to persuade the Europeans to throw money at
the crisis, the Chinese have constantly talked about the need for Europe
"to put its house in order" with economic reforms. My favourite quote
was from Jin Liqun, the top man in charge of China's Sovereign Wealth.
Jin Liqun said: "If you look at the troubles which have happened in
European countries, it is because of the accumulated troubles of their
worn out welfare society. I think their labour laws are outdated. I
think
their labour laws induce sloth and indolence rather than hardworking. Their
incentive system is totally out of whack." Deep down in their hearts the
European elite know Jin Liqun is right - but they won't admit it because
their whole lives are dedicated to trying to win the people's power by
pretending to be competent. To admit how bad the situation really is
would be to risk the guillotine, so they let the people slide down the
slippery slope to hell instead. So the humanitarian part of humanitarian
laissez-faire has built a completely cowardly and weak society.
I can explain the idea of self control & judgement by way of an analogy.
When I was school I remember reading a book about the "Ghost Towns" left
behind by the Californian "Gold Rush" in the USA. The miners who struck
rich liked to spend most of their profits in an orgy of excess, and
entire towns grew up around serving them. So some people invested their
life savings in gold mining, and some people invested both their own
money and borrowed money into building a service industry near them.
Then one day the gold stopped flowing and these towns rapidly imploded
and were left to rot away. Some lucky people who had cashed up their
chips walked away with a profit, but the majority came away with nothing, and the banks were
carried out on stretchers. One of the amazing things about all this is
that some of these towns even sprung up without anyone really finding
any gold. If Joseph Stalin had been running the Wild West instead of the
cowboys he would have noticed that these towns had no future and one day
nothing worthwhile would come from them, they were just greedy stupid
illusions of wealth, and Stalin would have banned gold mining and forced
the people to make his idea of socially useful things. I
think this Ghost Town story is a good metaphor for a large part of the European
economy. Now that the Europeans have stopped borrowing and partying a
lot of stuff is going to vanish extremely rapidly. There is no point
delaying this process with rescue packages, the Ghost Towns were bound
to fail, better to get it over and done with asap. What policy makers
need to do to survive this nightmare is avoid self indulgently rescuing
failing ideas; also to start judging what is and is not socially useful,
and then start building some new towns doing these useful sustainable things so the
unemployed people have somewhere new to go.
Greece is another policymaking tragedy. Two years ago I wrote an
important article about Greece saying:
Greece is the worst offender, but many other countries are facing
impending debt crises too. In fact almost the entire developed
democratic world faces considerable difficulty, especially as the
proportion of retirees increases over the next few decades... Yet
Greece's membership of the Eurozone is bringing her addiction to
unsustainable government borrowing to a more rapid climax. The Dollar
has strengthened recently, but I see in this crisis a silver lining that
could in the long term vastly enhance the reputation of the Eurozone.
With most rich democracies facing spiralling government debt I see
Eurozone membership as a purging medicine which is forcing early
resolution of an illness which could otherwise turn terminal; which is
forcing a proper cure not just pain numbing devaluation; and which is
treating individual member state cases before a pandemic develops.
Countries such as Greece and Italy have been rotting under incompetent
economic policy making for generations. With China, with climate change,
the challenges are only getting that much harder. The cruel game
changing disciple of Eurozone membership is the only hope of turning
these dieing states around. If Eurozone members get this right it will
put them head and shoulders above the Americans who have no such
mechanism to cure them of the modern democratic disease.
I also said:
It is absolutely critical that the EU is seen to be taking the lead,
and it must do so quickly before it is forced into a fire fighting
mode. The markets have to feel that the EU is making an example of
Greece, that other member states have more support, that the EU is
willing to sacrifice the profligate and dishonest Greeks in an awesome display of political courage and will.
If Greece fails the EU should give them a choice between surrendering
sovereignty and having a technocratic government imposed on them, or
being kicked out of the both the Eurozone and EU. The
fate of Greece, at the end of day, does not really matter much one way
or another; the key is to terrify other EU voters, forcing them to
accept more responsible policymaking; without that lesson, the Eurozone's long term survival is at risk...
Angela Merkel needs to announce: "Greece lied to gain entry to the
Eurozone and has been lying ever since. She has taken billions in
structural funds, her banks have borrowed billions from the ECB. Greece
now threatens the stability and reputation of the Eurozone, even the EU
itself. Germany is a generous country, yet we can not help Greece in its
current form. Doing so would be morally wrong; it also would be
impossible for German taxpayers to accept; and in the long term it would
only prolong the economic crisis in Greece, not solve it. Either Greece
must sort out its own problems, without defaulting, or it must surrender
sovereignty in return for aid. If it requires aid, Greece will be placed
under EU guardianship and her parliament suspended, meanwhile the EU
will assist financially. Once Greece's economic heath is restored,
Greece will be returned to democracy. Welcome to the 21st Century."
I used to describe Greece as almost a gift from the gods, a chance to
practice ones boxing skills on a corrupt rich little guy before taking
on the Italian gorilla. Now we have to go to war unprepared. Now the
pandemic nightmare is upon us. Now the Eurozone's very survival is
on the line.
Today lots of journalists have been writing articles saying if the grumpy
Germans won't bail out Italy then Italy should leave the Euro. But as
the commentator at Bloomberg News repeatedly pointed out to listeners "ITALIAN DEFAULT IS THE
END OF THE WORLD". Italy is not another Greece who can be sacrificed as
an example to the rest, if Italy defaults on its debt half the banks and
insurance companies across Europe are finished. Outside the
Eurozone neither the Italian government nor Italian banks are going to repay
their debts and the losses are going
to be unimaginable. Not only that, Italy has no future outside the
Eurozone anyway. What people don't realise it that you can't keep
devaluing your currency as an alternative to
economic reforms because it twists your economy in ways that make it
gradually more an
more inefficient. If your management and working practices suck you need
to change them, it's not a simple linear thing that can be solved by
paying your employees less. For forty years Italy has desperately needed
massive reforms, in or
out of the Euro the Italians are going to hell if they don't get them.
Today you see endless articles in the press by journalists saying the
Euro project was bound to fail and they knew it all along. But European
countries were happy as separate nation states under a gold standard up
until the 1930s. A currency is just a unit of exchange and what people
want from it is simply price stability. That means if you put your money
into the bank and leave it there for a few years instead of spending it,
when you eventually withdraw it you will be able to buy approximately as
many goods as you could have done when you put it in. Italy didn't have
that for most of it's history, and they are a lot better off with
what they have today, the fact they share it with someone else is
irrelevant as long as it works. The Eurozone problem was lax banking
regulations and Ghost Town real estate booms etc, not the currency
itself. The idea that every sovereign state has to have a separate
floating currency is economic mumbo-jumbo bananas. The lesson of history is that national currencies do not
work, that's why the gold standard was once so important. Of course the
gold standard eventually failed because people want a currency that
provides price stability for food, fuel and accommodation etc, not
jewellery. Yet that doesn't mean we want national currencies. Even today
the failure of national currencies is evident in the plight of
Switzerland, Japan, USA, China. Frankly the international global
currency system is breaking down, it looks like a period of chaos,
capital controls, protectionism etc is coming. So don't be fooled by the
hacks, the problem with Italy is not the Euro, it is Italian politics.
What does all that mean? It means, as the commentator at Bloomberg news
pointed out: ITALY NEEDS A TECHNOCRATIC GOVERNMENT IMMEDIATELY. What we
need is effectively the suspension of Italian democracy and
terrifying austerity measures and shocking economic reforms being forced
onto hapless voters at a time when the
external economic environment is catastrophic. Yes people are going to
go hungry and there are going to be riots, but there is absolutely no alternative.
We can't have more elections in Greece and Italy right now, what
we really need is a five year state of emergency and the suspension of
parliament and a team of Chinese technocrats to secretly give the EU a
big helping hand in suggesting reforms. The Chinese will come onside if
you show you are deadly serious and determined to do what it takes. In
fact the Chinese will use the crisis to exit their dollar position and
it will bring China and Europe together and build a new political world
order.
Of course suspending democracy and implementing terrifying reforms is a political nightmare, but we are in a nightmarish
situation. This is not a time for dogma, there is simply no choice. Now
is the time for politicians to realise how completely they have failed,
to announce to the world that our democratic setup has failed and it is
time to bite the bullet of reform. Realise that the economic
environment is much worse than the 1970s, it's possibly even worse than
the 1930s, several countries across Europe
fell into fascist dictatorships back in the 1970s, people are way more
spoilt and stupid today, democracy is finished sooner or later in
countries like Greece and Italy anyway.
The only question that we philosophers and historians are waiting to
find out is whether or not failing states ends up as EU
technocracies or populist tyrannies.
I realise people find this shocking, but there is no more time left to
keep playing muddle headed games. Most of all people in Europe are
afraid of death and war, but if countries like Greece and Italy inflict
astronomical financial losses on the Germans and Dutch and Finish, their
incumbent liberal political parties will certainly collapse and give
rise to virulent nationalism and eventually war. Just tell the votes the
truth for a change, tell them that Italian default will cost untold
amounts of money and create war, tell them you have no choice. Stop
trying to calm people down and pretend you are in control, scare them to
hell and paint yourself as a saviour.
There is a way to
restore some democratic legitimacy, and I have mentioned it in an
article of mine called
technocratic prison. The idea here is to let everyone in Europe vote
in a referendum for a system in which countries that fail are put under
technocracy, whilst other countries are given full freedom. I even
suggest toning down the EU, abolishing the EU parliament and returning
sovereignty to everyone else as part of the treaty change. Because this
technocratic prison system is the big huge political bazooka that shocks the
world, it ends the crisis instantly on the spot. If it was implemented
right away with the Greeks, and combined with a really bold austerity
package in Italy, the sovereign debt crisis might just end with only Greece
ever being imprisoned. Because it's so bold and violent it will
restore the faith of the German masses in Angela Merkel, she will go
from wimp to hero, and the German masses might even have the confidence to embrace Eurobonds. It is literally the last
option on the table.
Remember when every other path is death, you have to take the last path
left standing no matter how morally offensive you think it might be. You
can't let the millions of people you care for die because of your moral dogma or
reputation. Call the Chinese and discuss it with them if you need a
second opinion. The secret is this: analyse the crisis not by thinking about
moral dogma, but
by using pragmatism to cross out all the things that won't work. The
"what is not" pragmatic rather that "what is" moral
compass approach to decision
making was the secret encapsulated by the myth of Theseus and the
Minotaur. Instead of choosing the paths that felt as if they were
heading in the right direction, his ball of string told him which way
not to go. The myth tells the story of the vital step away from religious decision making that
founded the new intellectual paradigm in Ancient Greece. If the
politicians do not take this step away from dogma to pragmatism our
civilization will perish. This is our existential moment, and our very
lives are on the line.
|